Re-Imagined District 4 Waterfront Proposal Presented To Authorities In Hcmc
S&A Architecture and RMIT Vietnam last week unveiled its vision for a reimagined and remodeled District 4 Waterfront at the Heritage Preservation & Economic Development In Vietnam summit held in Ho Chi Minh City.
Dubbed ‘The Green Mile’ the project, undertaken by S&A Architecture in conjunction with students from the Australian university, and under the patronage of the Embassy of Italy in Hanoi, the Consulate General of Italy in Ho Chi Minh City and UNESCO Vietnam, saw a mixed-use development rich with public spaces, museums, living and working spaces, and revised traffic management presented to an audience of over 100.
The session, which included an address from Italy’s former Prime Minister H.E. Romano Prodi, attended by both the country’s ambassador and the city’s consul general, saw an audience of luminaries amazed by the collective talents of the architecture and student teams.
The Green Mile video showcased an academic proposal for the former Saigon Commercial Port includes edutainment & exhibition, co-working & logistic space, and residential & retail. The proposal also focuses on other factors that are desperately in need of the area by providing more than 200,000m2 of green space, the concept of “Sponge city” to mitigate the risk of flooding. To ease traffic flow, a tunnel underneath Nguyen Tat Thanh street has been proposed, so as an elevated walkway connects the upcoming Saigon metro network with the site, opening the accessibility for pedestrian and cyclists, which can be treated as an linear park, but also creating positive tension between existing and new planning proposal. This proposal in combination with the city’s plan to build new bridges can connect D4 to the emerging ‘second city’ of Thu Thiem across the river, and an environment that takes existing structures, and augments them, re-fits them, and re-imagines them into an ideal space for Saigon’s future.
Luigi Campanale, CEO and Design Director of S&A Architecture, the event’s host and producer of the re-envisioned District 4 Waterfront proposal described the area as a unique part of Ho Chi Minh City, but lamented a city-wide lack of public space and saw the D4 waterfront as one of the last chances the city will get to preserve a crucial link to its architectural and cultural past. Saying that “the future does not exist without a past”, and motivated by his own Milanese roots, he looked to ‘salvage’ D4, which he describes as a ‘spontaneous city within the city’.
RMIT’s Dean of School of Design & Communication, Professor Julia Gaimster, whose students co-developed the proposal for the District 4 re-imagining described the project as “The Future of the Past” and stressed that while much of the current talk around the development of Smart Cities focused on the technological aspect, a truly smart city encompasses so much more. “The heritage, the livability, the ability to work, live and play in your spaces. The areas that are public and the areas that are private, and the spaces in-between are all vital for everyone to have an environment in which they feel safe and engaged at home. A truly smart city needs to have a sense of its own identity. We are creating the heritage of the future while protecting the heritage of the past.”
The event featured a keynote address from Mr Nguyen Anh Tuan, Head of General Planning of the HCMC Department of Architecture and Planning talked of the current ‘heritage inventory’ under way in the city, along with revisions to the southern metropolis’ master plan.
He reflected upon the connectivity that dates to colonial times, the addressed even contemporary traffic concerns with multi-modal transportation options for HCMC and its surrounds via railways and waterways through the extensive canal network – describing it as “part of our city’s collective legacy” and discussed his hope that culture, art and heritage can be better integrated into Vietnam’s emerging mixed-use buildings. He spoke also of the ways in which better heritage protection can help to drive tourism to the city, help to build a stronger cultural identity for the city, and that this in turn can assist with the economic viability of preservation.
While congratulating both Ho Chi Minh City and the entire nation on its incredible growth, Ambassador Antonio Alessandro called upon the nation to be aware of the irreparable loss of Vietnam’s collective identity, which instead needs to be nurtured through bringing new life to spaces, along with the opportunities this brings for tourism to Vietnam’s cities. Describing Italy as being “uniquely qualified to safeguard these spaces” he said that he hopes that Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi are both able to “protect their heritage while responding to rapid urban growth while paying more care and attention to the smart and sustainable development of cities.” He highlighted that the Italy-Vietnam Strategic partnership – inked in 2013 – drew particular attention to the preservation of heritage and cultural relics.
Concurring with his national counterpart, the Consul General of Italy in HCMC H.E. Enrico Padula stated that “While Italy developed slowly and over time, factoring in the preservation of its heritage, Vietnam is different in the extremely fast growth of its economy.” Referring to Italian cities such as Milan and Torino – with manufacturing pasts that ultimately worked to repurpose their spaces and save them for posterity and preserve the rich cultural legacies that they represent. “These are an irreplaceable transference to our future generations,” he said.
Aware of the commercial challenges that sometimes arise in discussions over the preservation of heritage buildings, Knight Frank Vietnam Managing Director Alex Crane spoke of ways in which the authorities could help to allay some of the cost concerns to developers and investors to encourage them to adaptively reuse Vietnam’s heritage and mid-to-late 20th century buildings.
“In some cases, adaptive reuse of late 20th century buildings is starting to look financially viable. Retention, restoration or conversion of heritage buildings requires more support through regulation. Some countries offer tax breaks or allow write-offs to encourage developers to protect heritage buildings and other countries offer direct financial support. Alternatively incentives could be offered to foreign developers investing favorable regulations or preferential, faster permitting processes. Banks could consider expanding green loans for these reuse projects as they reduce net-new carbon and waste. Authorities could also look at awards and rewards for developers and could blend regrants of LURC’s upon completion of heritage projects to protect ROI, or building credits for gross floor area on a developer’s other projects for the space not-used in the preservation of a historical building.”